🔗 Share this article

The nation's supreme judicial authority has unanimously determined that all parents of newborn children are entitled to the same caregiver absence - a landmark ruling recognized as a significant win for fair treatment and family rights.

Existing Regulatory Inequality

Under the existing legislation, female parents are granted one-third of a year of absence, while dads are granted just 10 days.

Through its judgment, the Constitutional Court stated portions of the law invalid, calling it biased against dads, and decided that all caregivers may now distribute the provided absence however they choose.

"This represents a pioneering move for equality, parental health, and the prospects of fatherhood in South Africa," said a representative, creator of a parental rights group.

Judicial History

Previously, a trial court determined particular parts of the employment legislation and the insurance law unjust and ruled that they infringed upon the rights of various household types.

The Gauteng High Court then determined that the law showed bias toward types of parents differently regarding the duration of parenting time and financial support granted.

Court Proceedings

The legal action was brought to court by a partners, the Commission for Gender Equality and additional parties, who aimed to correct the disproportionate load placed primarily on birth mothers, highlighting that parenting responsibilities should be divided.

The petitioners argued that the existing law treated unequally against mothers and fathers who were different from the delivering parent - namely, fathers, adoptive parents, and caregivers of children through surrogates - by allowing them merely a brief period of parental leave, while the birth mother received four months.

Judicial Reasoning

Announcing the decision on this week, Justice Zukisa Tshiqi declared that all caregivers should be entitled to divide the available days as they considered suitable, labeling the current law archaic and one which "unequally pressured mothers and marginalized dads".

"The shielding of biological mothers to the elimination of different guardians has the unfortunate consequence of perpetuating the belief that mothers are, and should be, the main guardians of babies.

"The male parent is excluded and deprived of the opportunity to participate as a caregiver in the rearing of the newborn during the formative months of development," she continued.

Judge Tshiqi stated the judgment was not just about fair treatment but also about preserving the respect of parents, stressing that the main consideration of the judicial ruling was the wellbeing of infants.

"The unequal treatment not only excludes caregivers but also prevents babies of the opportunity to be with their guardians during a crucial period of nurturing and adjustment to their new environment."

Responses and Implications

The claimants welcomed the decision, while legal experts advised that the decision would have far-reaching implications for businesses, who will need to adjust their current leave policies to follow the judgement.

"The core of the lawsuit is that it underscores the requirement to offer equal caregiver entitlements, recognizing that raising an infant is a joint duty," an official from the rights organization informed the press.

He said the current law "did not reflect evolving societal norms around child-rearing".

Workplace legal expert an expert stated to government press that the ruling was "a favorable and anticipated result" for family privileges in the nation.

Implementation Timeline

The tribunal has suspended its ruling of unconstitutionality for three years, allowing the government opportunity to change the current laws to comply with its judgement.

Meanwhile, parents will be entitled to choose how they want to divide the allocated time of time off.

In cases where a single guardian is working, that guardian may use the complete time off allowance.